Fractional CTO
You don’t need a full-time CTO. You need someone accountable.
Most businesses under a couple of hundred people have nobody whose actual job is deciding what technology the company should do next. The decisions still get made, usually by whoever is loudest, or by a vendor with something to sell. BSD provides fractional CTO leadership for Toronto and GTA businesses: a named senior executive who owns the roadmap, sets the AI agenda, manages the vendors, and answers for it in your leadership meetings, a few days a month.
The gap nobody is filling
There is a specific hole in most mid-sized businesses. You have people who can execute: an IT provider, a developer, someone in operations who is unusually good with systems. What you do not have is anyone whose job is to decide. So the technology strategy ends up being the sum of whatever got approved when someone asked.
The symptoms are recognisable. Nobody can say what the business spends on software in total. Three systems do overlapping jobs because each was bought by a different department. A renewal comes up and the only options are pay it or panic. Someone brings an AI idea to a meeting and the discussion has no way to conclude, because there is no agreed basis for deciding what is worth funding. None of that is an execution problem. It is an absence of ownership.
What the role covers
Four things we take ownership of.
-
Technology roadmap & budget
A written twelve to twenty-four month plan with priorities, costs, and reasons attached, and a total picture of what you spend now. Decisions your leadership makes deliberately, instead of ones that happen to you at renewal time.
-
AI strategy & prioritisation
Which AI ideas would actually pay for themselves in your business, which are a distraction, and in what order. Including the unpopular part: telling you when the honest answer is not yet, or not this.
-
Vendor & contract management
Someone technical in the room when you are being sold to, who reads the contract, knows the market rate, and can tell a real capability from a demo. Renewals negotiated rather than rolled over.
-
Risk & board-level reporting
Technology and AI risk stated in business terms your board, your insurer, and your clients’ security questionnaires can all use. No jargon shield, and no surprises in the room.
AI is what made this urgent
For years a business could get by without technology leadership, because the decisions were slow and mostly reversible. You picked a server, an accounting package, a phone system, and lived with it for five years. Being a little late cost you a little efficiency.
AI broke that pattern in both directions. The upside arrived faster than procurement cycles can move: work that took a person three hours a day can now be automated in a fortnight, and a competitor who does it before you notice has a real cost advantage. The downside arrived faster too. Staff adopt tools nobody approved, confidential material leaves the business through a browser tab, and the exposure is created by people trying to do their jobs well.
Both of those need someone with authority and judgment, and neither is a support ticket. The businesses getting AI right are not the ones with the best tools. They are the ones where somebody senior is deciding, deliberately, what to adopt and what to refuse. That is the job we are describing.
When the answer is build it, our AI implementation team is the one that does the work, so the strategy and the delivery are not two separate relationships you have to keep aligned.
How the engagement actually runs
It starts with thirty days of getting to the truth. We inventory what you run, what you spend, what you are exposed to, and what your team is quietly working around. That produces a written assessment and the three things we think you should do first. Clients tell us this document alone changes how they talk about technology in budget meetings, because for the first time everything is on one page.
After that it settles into a rhythm. A monthly leadership meeting where technology has a standing place on the agenda rather than appearing only when something is broken. A quarterly roadmap review where we re-rank priorities against what has actually changed in the business. Vendor conversations we sit in on. And availability in between, for the decisions that will not wait until the next meeting.
You get a named person, not a rotating account team. The same executive is in the room in month one and month twenty-four, which is the entire point: the value of this role is accumulated context, and it resets to zero every time the person changes.
Why a thirty-year IT firm is a good place to get this
Technology leadership is a judgment role, and judgment comes from having watched things fail. We have been in IT for more than thirty years and managing client infrastructure since 2017, across law firms, accounting practices, manufacturers, brokerages, and clinics. We have seen the migration that should not have been attempted, the platform that was a fine product and a terrible fit, and the automation that worked beautifully until the one person who understood it left.
We also do the work, which changes the quality of the advice. An advisory-only firm can recommend an architecture it will never have to operate at two in the morning. We cannot, because we are usually the ones who will. That constraint makes our recommendations more conservative and considerably more honest.
The obvious objection, answered
If we advise you and also sell to you, our incentives are not perfectly clean. That is true, and we would rather put it in writing than have you wonder about it. Three things keep it workable. The roadmap is a written document with the reasoning attached, so any recommendation can be challenged on its merits. We benchmark our own work against the market and tell you when a specialist is the better answer. And the retainer does not depend on you approving projects, so advising you to spend less does not cost us the engagement. If you would still rather your strategic advisor had no delivery arm at all, that is a reasonable position and we will tell you so plainly.
Frequently Asked Questions
What does a fractional CTO actually do that our IT provider doesn’t?
Support answers the question you asked. Leadership tells you which questions you should be asking. A managed IT provider keeps your systems running, patches them, and fixes what breaks. A fractional CTO decides what you should be building, what you should stop paying for, which AI ideas are worth funding and which are a distraction, whether a vendor contract is a good deal, and how much technology risk your business is carrying. One is execution. The other is the decision that came before it.
How much does a fractional CTO cost?
A full-time CTO in the Toronto market is a senior executive salary plus benefits and equity, which is why most businesses under a few hundred people never hire one and go without the function entirely. We charge a fixed monthly retainer for a defined number of days, so it is a predictable line in your budget rather than a project that keeps growing. We will tell you at the outset how many days your business actually needs, and that is usually fewer than people expect.
Isn’t there a conflict of interest if you advise us and also sell to us?
It is the right question and we would rather answer it than have you wonder. Yes, we do both, and we handle it in three ways. The roadmap is written down with the reasoning attached, so every recommendation can be argued with. We quote our own work against the market and we tell you when someone else is a better fit, including when the honest answer is that you should not buy anything this quarter. And the retainer is not contingent on you approving projects, so recommending less work does not cost us the engagement. If you would rather your advisor had no delivery arm at all, that is a legitimate preference and we will say so.
Do we have to use you for managed IT as well?
No. Plenty of fractional CTO engagements sit on top of an IT provider that is not us, and part of the job is holding that provider to a standard on your behalf. It works better when we run the environment too, because we can see what is actually happening instead of asking someone else for a report, but it is not a condition. We have also been hired specifically to assess an incumbent provider, which is an awkward assignment we are happy to take.
What size of business is this for?
The pattern we see most often is between roughly fifteen and two hundred people: large enough that technology decisions now carry real money and real risk, small enough that there is no executive whose job it is to make them. Below that size an owner can usually still hold it in their head. Above it you should be hiring a full-time CTO, and we have helped clients do exactly that and then handed over.
How quickly would we see anything useful?
The first thirty days produce an honest assessment: what you are spending, what you are exposed to, what is working, and the three things worth doing first. That document alone usually changes a budget conversation. From there it settles into a rhythm of monthly leadership meetings and a quarterly roadmap review, with the projects themselves delivered by our team or by whoever you choose.
Paired with AI implementation, managed IT, and cybersecurity. One standard of care, from the decision through to the thing running in production.